Gainesville, Florida
Submitted, revised, February 13, 2001.
Hypnosis has been used in obstetrics for more than a century with little empiric evaluation of the effects of this type of intervention on labor and delivery. We evaluated how childbirth preparation incorporating hypnotic techniques affected the labor processes and birth outcomes of pregnant adolescents. The study included 42 teenaged patients receiving prenatal treatment at a county public health department before their 24th week of pregnancy. They were randomly assigned to either a treatment group receiving a childbirth preparation protocol under hypnosis or a control group receiving supportive counseling. When labor and delivery outcome measures were compared in the 2 groups, significant differences favoring the hypnosis intervention group were found in the number of complicated deliveries, surgical procedures, and length of hospital stay. Larger studies in different populations are needed. |
key words Hypnosis; obstetrics; labor; delivery; anesthesia. (J Fam Pract 2001; 50:441-443) |
Hypnosis has been used to control pain during labor and delivery for more than a century, but the introduction of chemo-anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia during the late 19th century led to the decline of its use.1,2 Recently there has been a resurgence of this technique in obstetrics.3-7 Hypnotherapy has been found to be effective in providing pain relief,8,9 reducing the need for chemical anesthesia,8 and reducing anxiety, fear, and pain related to childbirth.1,2,7,10,11 Hypnosis has also been helpful in both managing various complications of pregnancy (such as premature labor5,12-14) and reducing the likelihood of premature labor and birth in high-risk patients.12 It has also has been effective in the treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum,15-16 acute hypertension associated with pregnancy17 and conversion of breech to vertex presentation.18
One promising application of hypnosis is in the area of labor and delivery.1,5,6,19 The use of hypnosis in preparing the patient for labor and delivery is based on the premise that such preparation reduces anxiety, improves pain tolerance (lowering the need for medication), reduces birth complications, and promotes a rapid recovery process.1,2,5 The key aspect of this treatment is involvement of the patient before labor begins, to promote her active participation and sense of control in the labor and delivery process. This is accomplished through educating the patient about this process and teaching her alternate ways to produce hypno-analgesia and anesthesia.1,2 Hypnotic preparation thus provides the expectant mother with a sense of control for managing her anxiety and physical discomfort.
Although there have been numerous reports suggesting the value of hypnosis in obstetrics, our study is one of the first to report a randomized controlled evaluation of childbirth preparation incorporating hypnotic techniques on labor processes and birth outcomes.
Our subjects were teenage patients (18 years or younger at the time of conception) who entered prenatal treatment with normal pregnancies at a Florida county public health department before the end of their 24th week. The clinic nursing director performed a chart review and identified 47 patients meeting the criteria. These patients were randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group. The treatment group received childbirth preparation in self-hypnosis that incorporated information on labor and delivery (the detailed protocol is described in a previous publication1). The control group received supportive counseling designed to control for interpersonal contact and social support and to provide an opportunity for discussion about pregnancy issues of concern to the patient. Patients in the treatment and control groups had the same number of visits.
We obtained institutional review board approval and informed consent from individual patients. The subjects were told that the study was an attempt to provide support for pregnant adolescents in addition to the routine prenatal care provided by the public health department and that they would be randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups, their intervention session would coincide with scheduled clinic appointments and would not interrupt their medical treatment in any way, and their participation was voluntary.
Both groups of patients received the standard prenatal treatment protocol from the medical staff, nurse practitioners, and hospital staff, all of whom were blind to group assignments. All patients were delivered at the local teaching hospital by obstetrics department staff who were blind to the study. The study interventions were begun with individual meetings with patients during regular clinic visits between 20 and 24 weeks’ gestation. Continuing clinic visits were scheduled for all patients on a biweekly basis, making the time span of the 4-session experimental conditions approximately 8 weeks. The study counselor (the primary author) provided hypnosis preparation training for the treatment group; a nurse midwife provided the supportive contact with the control group. Both interventions were completed before delivery; no prompting occurred during the labor and delivery process.
The 2 groups of patients were compared on medication use (Pitocin, anesthetic, and postpartum medication), complications and surgical intervention during delivery, and length of hospital stay for mothers and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission for the infants. Complications fell into 36 categories of events (eg, multiple pregnancies, preeclampsia, vacuum-assisted delivery) that were entered in subjects’ records by obstetric staff who were unaware of the study. Statistical analysis was based on a simple count of the presence or absence of complications in the medical record by researchers (the researchers were not blinded to the patient’s study assignment).
Of the 47 patients, 3 moved out of the geographic area before delivery, and 2 patients (1 in each group) did not complete the research protocol and were not included in the research. Results were thus obtained for 22 patients in the hypnosis group and 20 in the control group, resulting in a total of 42 subjects. A two-tailed Fisher exact analysis at the .05 level was used to test for significance.
Only one patient in the hypnosis group had a hospital stay of more than 2 days compared with 8 patients in the control group (P=.008). None of the 22 patients in the hypnosis group experienced surgical intervention compared with 12 of the 20 patients in the control group (P=.000). Twelve patients in the hypnosis group experienced complications compared with 17 in the control group (P=.047). Although consistently fewer patients in the hypnosis group used anesthesia (10 vs 14), Pitocin (2 vs 6), or postpartum medication (7 vs 11), and fewer had infants admitted to the NICU (1 vs 5), statistical analysis was nonsignificant.
Discussion
We focused on the educational preparation of the patient while in hypnosis to create the expectation of a normal labor and delivery, develop a conditioned response of comfort and confidence, and facilitate an increased sense of control in achieving a healthy delivery.
The subjects in the treatment group received a 4-session sequence of standard hypnotic interventions incorporating childbirth preparation information (ie, the hypnoreflexogenous method1,2,20) in which they were instructed in the methods and benefits of focused relaxation and imagery to increase the likelihood of a safe and relatively pain-free delivery. The sessions provided an opportunity to experience and practice hypnotic induction and deep relaxation. The suggestions directed toward the expectant mothers during the hypnotic state focused on the conceptualization of pregnancy and childbirth as a healthy natural process. Suggestions were also given to help the patient respond to possible complications, in the event they might occur.1 These suggestions were designed to increase the patient’s sense of trust in her physician and her confidence in her own ability to manage anxiety and discomfort. Hypnotic inductions also included ego-strengthening techniques and suggestions for a relatively discomfort-free delivery and suggestions for the application of the hypnotic techniques to other stressful periods in their lives. In each session the patients were given the opportunity to ask any questions of concern regarding the method or the pregnancy.
The main limitations of our study are the relatively small number of subjects and the fact that these patients were adolescent women, which affects the generalizability of results.
Future research should involve a larger subject pool including adults, have a control group receiving traditional prenatal care with no added intervention, and provide an analysis of cost-saving benefits.
Our study provides support for the use of hypnosis to aid in preparation of obstetric patients for labor and delivery. The reduction of complications, surgery, and hospital stay show direct medical benefit to mother and child and suggest the potential for a corresponding cost-saving benefit.
· Acknowledgments ·
We would like to acknowledge the pioneering workon the use of hypnosis in obstetrics by the late William Werner, MD, and express appreciation for his assistance in designing the intervention protocol. We would also like to thank Maury Nation, PhD, for his assistance with statistical analysis and Poorti Karve Riley, MD, for her comments on a previous version of this manuscript.
REFERENCES
- Schauble PG, Werner WEF, Rai SH, Martin A. Childbirth preparation through hypnosis: the hypnoreflexogenous protocol. Am J Clin Hypnosis 1998;40:273–83.
- Werner WEF, Schauble PG, Knudson MS. An argument for the revival of hypnosis in obstetrics. Am J Clin Hypnosis 1982;24:149–71.
- Dillenburger K, Keenan M. Obstetric hypnosis: an experience. Contemp Hypnosis 1996;13:202–04.
- Baram DA. Hypnosis in reproductive health care: a review and case report. Birth 1995;22:37–42.
- Goldman L. The use of hypnosis in obstetrics. Psychiatric Med 1992;10:59–67.
- Harmon TM, Hynan MT, Tyre TE. Improved obstetric outcomes using hypnotic analgesia and skill mastery combined with childbirth education. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990;58:525–30.
- Kroger WS. Hypnoanesthesia in obstertrics. In: Davis CH, ed. Gynecology and obstetrics. Hagerstown, Md: Harper & Row; 1960.
- Mairs DAE. Hypnosis and pain in childbirth. Contemp Hypnosis 1995;12:111–18.
- Hilgard ER, Hilgard JR. Hypnosis in the relief of pain. Revised ed. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel; 1994.
- Martin J. Hypnosis gains legitimacy, respect, in diverse clinical specialties. J Am Med Assoc 1983;249:319–21.
- Oster MI. Psychological preparation for labor and delivery using hypnosis. Am J Clin Hypnosis 1994;37:12–21.
- Cheek DB. The early use of psychotherapy in prevention of pre-term labor: the application of hypnosis and ideomotor techniques with women carrying twin pregnancies. Pre Peri Natal Psychol J 1995;10:5–19.
- Omer H. A hypnotic relaxation technique for the treatment of premature labor. Am J Clin Hypnosis 1987;29:206–14.
- Peterson G. Prenatal bonding, prenatal communication, and the prevention of prematurity. Pre Peri Natal Psychol J 1987;2:87–92.
- Iancu I, Kotler M, Spivak B, Radwan M, Weizaman A. Psychiatric aspects of hyperemesis gravidarum. Psychother Psychosom 1994;61:143–49.
- Torem MS. Hypnotherapeutic techniques in the treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum. Am J Clin Hypnosis 1994;37:1–11.
- Smith CH. Acute pregnancy-associated hypertension treated with hypnosis: a case report. Am J Clin Hypnosis 1989;31:209–11.
- Mehl LE. Hypnosis and conversion of the breech to the vertex presentation. Arch Fam Med 1994;3:881–87.
- Jenkins MW, Pritchard MH. Hypnosis: practical applications and theoretical considerations in normal labor. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1993;100:221–26.
- Roig-Garcia S. The hypnoreflexogenous method: a new procedure in obstetrical psychoanalgesia. Am J Clin Hypnosis 1961;4:14–21
The Journal of Family Practice ©2001
Most women experience some form of morning sickness during their pregnancy, especially between the 5th and 12th weeks. However, about 1 percent of pregnant women experience severe nausea and vomiting, a condition called hyperemesis gravidarum. While normal morning sickness is thought to be caused by rising hormone levels, the precise cause of hyperemesis gravidarum is unknown.
Hyperemesis gravidarum, or HG, is characterized by severe nausea, vomiting, weight loss, and electrolyte disturbance. Women who suffer from this condition may experience dehydration, headaches, confusion, rapid heart rate, and fainting; and may be unable to work, complete usual daily tasks, or maintain a normal social routine. Left untreated, severe cases of HG can cause significant health problems for you and your baby. Acid-based disturbances caused by malnutrition and dehydration can lead to kidney and liver injury, persistent vomiting can lead to esophageal tears, and nutritional deficiencies can lead to neurological changes. Risks to the baby include premature birth, low birth weight, and a slight increase in malformation of the central nervous system and skin.
HG is usually diagnosed by ruling out any other cause of severe nausea and vomiting such as pancreatitis, hepatitis, peptic ulcer disease, and hyperthyroidism. Your doctor will take a full medical history, perform a thorough clinical evaluation, and identify your symptoms.
How to tell the difference between HG and normal morning sickness:
| Morning Sickness | Hyperemesis Gravidarum |
| Nausea sometimes accompanied by vomiting | Nausea accompanied by severe vomiting |
| Nausea that subsides at 12 weeks or soon thereafter | Nausea that continues past the first trimester (13 weeks) |
| Vomiting that does not cause severe dehydration | Vomiting that causes severe dehydration |
| You are able to keep some food down | You cannot keep any food down |
If you are diagnosed with HG, you will most likely be hospitalized immediately to restore fluids and replace electrolytes intravenously. You may also receive vitamin supplements, especially vitamins B6, C, and thiamine. You should not consume food orally until the vomiting stops and dehydration has been corrected; if vomiting persists, you may be given antiemetic (anti-nausea and vomiting) drug therapy.
Studies performed to determine the cause of HG have been inconclusive. It is thought that estrogen, progesterone, adrenal, and pituitary hormones all play a part. Psychological and social factors also seem to have a connection. For example, women who are having an unwanted pregnancy; or young, unwed mothers who feel harassed by their parents for their "mistake" seem to have a higher incidence of HG. The disease is also more common among women with a higher body weight, no previous completed pregnancies, those who are carrying twins, first-time pregnancies, and those with a history of HG in previous pregnancies. It is becoming clear that HG is a complex physiological disease probably caused by multiple factors.
Acupressure and hypnosis has been shown to help some women suffering from HG. The pressure point to reduce nausea is located at the middle of the inner wrist and applying pressure to this point may help some HG sufferers. Seabands that use this pressure point can be purchased at many drug stores.
by Tremeau ML; Fontanie-Ravier P; Teurnier F; Demouzon J. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 1992, 21(4):375-80.
Abstract:
Protocol was carried out on 98 patients who were divided into three groups selected as (one control group, two 'placebo' group, and three treated with acupuncture).
This protocol showed that it was possible to improve cervical maturation if acupuncture sessions were carried out at the beginning of the 9th month. The Bishop scores in the three groups after 10 days interval showed that there was a significant progression of 2.61 points in the group treated with acupuncture as against only 0.89 and 1.08 in the placebo and control groups.
Acupuncture for cervical ripening and induction of labor at term--a randomized controlled trial.
Rabl M, Ahner R, Bitschnau M, Zeisler H, Husslein P., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vienna, Austria.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether acupuncture at term can influence cervical ripening, induce labor and thus reduce the need for postdates induction. METHODS: On the estimated date of confinement (EDC) women were prospectively randomized to an acupuncture group (AG) or a control group (CG). Data of 45 women were evaluated (AG, n = 25; CG, n = 20). Inclusion criteria were as follows: confirmed EDC, uncomplicated course of pregnancy, singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation. Exclusion criteria were as follows: cervical dilation > 3 cm, active labor, premature rupture of membranes, previous cesarean section, pathologies in mother or fetus. Women were examined at 2-day intervals. The cervical length was measured with vaginal ultrasonography, cervical mucus was obtained for a fetal Fibronectin test and the cervical status was assessed according to the Bishop score. In the AG, the points Hegu (Large Intestine 4) and Sanyinjiao (Spleen 6) were pierced on both sides every second day. If women were not delivered 10 days after EDC, labor was induced by administering vaginal prostaglandin tablets. RESULTS: The cervical length in the AG was shorter than that in the CG on day 6 and day 8 after EDC (P = 0.04 for both). In the AG the time period from the first positive Fibronectin test to delivery was 2.3 days, while that in the CG was 4.2 days (P = 0.08). The time period from EDC to delivery was on average 5.0 days in the AG and 7.9 days in the CG (P = 0.03). Labor was induced in 20% of women in the AG (n = 5) and in 35% in the CG (n = 7) (P = 0.3). Overall duration of labor, and first and second stage of labor were not different in the two groups. In 56% of women who underwent acupuncture (n = 14) and in 65% of controls (n = 13), Oxytocin was used to augment labor. (P = 0.54). CONCLUSION: Acupuncture at points LI4 and SP 6 supports cervical ripening at term and can shorten the time interval between the EDC and the actual time of delivery.
Influence of acupuncture on Doppler ultrasound in pregnant women.
Zeisler H, Eppel W, Husslein P, Bernaschek G, Deutinger J., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vienna, General Hospital Vienna, Austria.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of acupuncture on the blood flow in the umbilical artery (UA), fetal aorta and uterine artery and on the fetal heart rate using two different acupuncture points (SP-6 (Sanyinjiao) and LI-4 (Hegu)). METHODS: In group A (n = 50), measurements (Doppler ultrasound and fetal heart rate) were performed at term after an uneventful pregnancy (#1) followed by acupuncture treatment using the acupuncture-point SP-6 bilaterally. The treatment time lasted 15 min after which the next measurement (#2) was carried out. The needles were then inserted into the LI-4 acupuncture point for a further 15 min. A third measurement at the end of acupuncture treatment (#3) completed the session. In group B (n = 25), measurements were made before (#1) and after (#4) acupuncture at LI-4 acupuncture points only. RESULTS: In group A, the mean systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratios of UA #1, UA #2 and UA #3 were 2.45, 2.38 and 2.22, respectively (P = 0.0012). The difference in mean S/D ratios between UA #1 and UA #3 as well as that between UA #2 and UA#3 were statistically significant (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.008, respectively). There was no difference between the mean S/D ratios of the uterine artery and between the mean resistance indices of the fetal aorta. In group B, the only significant difference between measurements following acupuncture treatment was in fetal heart rate (139 vs. 143 bpm, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates a positive influence of acupuncture treatment on umbilical artery waveforms when using a combination of SP-6 (Sanyinjiao) and LI-4 (Hegu) acupuncture points. Acupuncture performed at these sites either individually or in combination does not seem to affect blood flow in the fetal aorta or uterine artery.
Influence of acupuncture on the pregnancy rate in patients who undergo assisted reproduction therapy.
Paulus WE, Zhang M, Strehler E, El-Danasouri I, Sterzik K., Department of Reproductive Medicine, Christian-Lauritzen-Institut, Ulm, Germany.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of acupuncture on the pregnancy rate in assisted reproduction therapy (ART) by comparing a group of patients receiving acupuncture treatment shortly before and after embryo transfer with a control group receiving no acupuncture. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Fertility center. PATIENT(S): After giving informed consent, 160 patients who were undergoing ART and who had good quality embryos were divided into the following two groups through random selection: embryo transfer with acupuncture (n = 80) and embryo transfer without acupuncture (n = 80). INTERVENTION(S): Acupuncture was performed in 80 patients 25 minutes before and after embryo transfer. In the control group, embryos were transferred without any supportive therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of a fetal sac during an ultrasound examination 6 weeks after embryo transfer. RESULT(S): Clinical pregnancies were documented in 34 of 80 patients (42.5%) in the acupuncture group, whereas pregnancy rate was only 26.3% (21 out of 80 patients) in the control group. CONCLUSION(S): Acupuncture seems to be a useful tool for improving pregnancy rate after ART.
Pre-Term Labour: The effect of acupuncture on uterine contraction induced by oxytocin.
Pak SC, Na CS, Kim JS, Chae WS, Kamiya S, Wakatsuki D, Morinaka Y, Wilson L Jr., Department of Acupuncture and Anatomy, Dongshin University, Naju, South Korea.
Preterm labor (PTL) is one of the main causes of fetal mortality and morbidity in obstetrical medicine. Current methods of treatment are not very effective and often have significant side effects. For this reason new methods of preventing PTL are currently being sought. In Western medicine the newest development is oxytocin antagonists. In Oriental medicine acupuncture and moxibustion are being utilized for the purpose of stopping PTL. The goals of this study were to determine if acupuncture in pregnant rats can suppress oxytocin induced uterine contractions and to compare these results with those inhibited by an oxytocin antagonist. Uterine contractions were induced by continuous infusion of exogenous oxytocin. The first fetus in one uterine horn near the ovarian end was removed and distilled water-filled catheter was inserted into that vacated amniotic sac to measure uterine contractions as intrauterine pressure changes. Two acupuncture points of Ho-Ku (LI-4) and San-Yin-Chiao (Sp-6) were selected for acupuncture and Kuan-Yuan (Co-4) was used for moxibustion. The oxytocin-induced uterine contractions were significantly suppressed by acupuncture on the LI-4 (p < 0.05), but not by Sp-6. Stimulation of Co-4 by moxibustion had no significant (p > 0.05) tocolytic effect. The administration of oxytocin antagonist eliminated all the uterine contractions induced by oxytocin. The application of acupuncture to re-stimulate the activity that was suppressed by the oxytocin antagonist did not produce any positive results. However, prostaglandins did cause the uterus to contract. In conclusion, acupuncture on LI-4 was found to suppress uterine contractions induced by oxytocin in the pregnant rat. If acupuncture is similarly effective in counteracting the effects of oxytocin in women, then this may an alternative medical treatment for women in preterm labor.
ALL COPYRIGHTS fourseas
No part or parts of this site is to be copied by any persons or transferred/linked to any other internet site without
prior permission from fourseas owner(s) - email info@fourseas.co.uk Telephone or text 07981073456.